This item is currently not available. If you have this item,
Join and post it to share with others.
In a world with no poverty, no crime, no sickness and no unemployment, and where every family is happy, 12-year-old Jonas is chosen to be the community's Receiver of Memories. Under the tutelage of the Elders and an old man known as the Giver, he discovers the disturbing truth about his utopian world and struggles against the weight of its hypocrisy. With echoes ofBrave New World, in this 1994 Newbery Medal winner, Lowry examines the idea that people might freely choose to give up their humanity in order to create a more stable society. Gradually Jonas learns just how costly this ordered and pain-free society can be, and boldly decides he cannot pay the price.
Amazing Book One of the most amazing books I've ever read. I read it when I was in fourth grade and I have remembered the book ever since. It's a great read for many ages and it makes the reader think about what life would be like with no emotional connections or anything like that.
Terrible Zero stars would be more accurate.
The most important thing in a novel is creating a believable and interesting world. Flop. There are more inconsistencies and gaps in this boring, cardboard prop of a world than I would think possible in a book written by an adult.
The next most important thing is interesting characters the reader cares about. Flop. The only character that even approaches interesting is Asher, but not by much. The main characters are exasperatingly flat. The Giver himself is unforgivably dull.
I wouldn't recommend this book for any person of any age - especially children who might be inexperienced enough to think this book may actually have something interesting to say. I hope anyone who's read a book could judge this a pitiful attempt at a story. But it wants to be more than a story. It wants to send a message, and at that it fails woefully worse than it does as merely a story.
For a good story, give your child J. R. R. Tolkien or C. S. Lewis. For dystopia, give them Ayn Rand or George Orwell. Treating The Giver with serious attention is ridiculous. Why waste valuable reading time with such worthless drivel? I am amazed this book is on reading lists and has won awards. Completely baffled. I bought it thinking it would be good to have for my kids to read, but now it's a toy for the baby to tear up or slobber on as he pleases. But if your looking for baby toys, there are better alternatives in that area as well.Technology's Role in our Lives Now, as technology touch every inch of our existence, how much we think and to what extent should we allow them into our lives?
The reason I am reflecting is that I read a book entitled The Giver which is written by Lois Lowry. This book actually is for a book for children, and in fact have won a good number of awards, including the John Newbery Medal for most distinguished contribution to American Literature for Children. It was originally read by my son who told me it was good, and I took it. Incidentally, it is always good to take an active interest in what your kids are reading, and ocassionally won't harm much if you actually read it as well. That i believe, always create good talking points with your kids.
The story is quite thought provoking, and basically centers on a community in which the people, years into the future, use technology try to create a world where everything is perfect. It might seem bizarre, but overall, it does seem plausible that if we are too overzealous and if we could do it, we will be headed in that direction.
When you consider that a lot of grief or sorrow is because of poverty, then solve poverty. A lot of bad things come because of war, then use technology to acquire peace. If hunger is the issue, then insure that there won't be any hunger. But the policymakers in this book went beyond that -- they noted that a lot of grief comes from pain, so they were able to work out the perfect medicines that will cure pain and disease. Much grief comes from love, envy, anger, and greed, so basically they develop the pills to control that as well.
If you consider that people also becomes sorrowful because they make the wrong choice so they eliminated choice as well. So in this community, a committee of experts make the evaluation what jobs you get ( depending on detailed recordings and observations on your interests and talents), who you marry, and also they have systems to insure that only healthy kids are born, and these are assigned to the right 'nurturers' to insure comformance of the system.
In short, this was supposedly a story about a society where there is supposedly no fear, or no pain. Something like nirvana, or heaven, where everything works and is programmed to be just right. There is nothing unexpected, unusual or even inconvenient. Everything works according to plan, just like clockwork.
In short, the author perceives that we can actually not only use technology to improve our lives, but if we are not controlled, we will be moving forward to using it to shield us from everything that would cause sadness or grief, and if we allow technology to do that, sooner or later, we will come up with technology to do precisely that.
Isn't that what we all want? Or where we are heading?
The hero, a 12 year old boy was selected to receive special training which allows him to experience true pain and pleasure. He later tries to opt out of the system, because he believes being 'human' is something that is different. Which begs the question that if you don't know sorrow, would you know happiness? If you don't know or have experienced failure, would you appreciate what it is to be successful. If you never experience hunger, would you know how lucky you are to always have food in the t able?
Now , more and more, as our society advance, we do start to being able to get practically everything we want, but we think we are doing our children a favor by doing everything to shield them from the bad things that we as parents also have experienced before. We shield them from pain, from hunger, from anything inconvenient or anything closely resembling hard work?
Are we therefore using technology the right way? Is that how we envision technology to increasingly play in our lives - shield us from the real challenges of the world?
